*pWp*CL@n* Forums
Welcome to *pWp* clans official forums. If you have any issues logging in please contact TaD#8370 or TheDude#8394 on Discord: https://discord.gg/whMrrWgHMf
*pWp*CL@n* Forums
Welcome to *pWp* clans official forums. If you have any issues logging in please contact TaD#8370 or TheDude#8394 on Discord: https://discord.gg/whMrrWgHMf

You are not connected. Please login or register

Moon landing, 1969.

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Moon landing, 1969. Empty Moon landing, 1969. Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:58 pm

T@D

T@D
*pWp*Founder*
*pWp*Founder*

I started this debate a few months back, but to no real avail. I really want to know what everyone thinks. I want to see what current schools are teaching aobut this event and if anyone has proof pertaining to either side.

http://www.pwpclan.org

2Moon landing, 1969. Empty Re: Moon landing, 1969. Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:00 pm

eXcel

avatar
I Just got here!

ok then lemme "debate"
in my opinion it did not happend and its enough to think at the technology they had in that period and the understanding not to mention the computer's power was hundreds of times lower then now... my shitty laptop could compete.
and i dont wanna meantion all the evidence over and over again.. like shadows not perpendicular to each other (means there were more sources of light) and the magnetic field around the planet...

3Moon landing, 1969. Empty Re: Moon landing, 1969. Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:37 pm

TheRustySpoon

TheRustySpoon
Quake III Member
Quake III Member

The understanding of the physics is not hard as you might think. To escape the gravitational field of the earth, you can use pretty much highschool physics to find out. (You would need to do E = mgh but take into account of the g decreasing as you go higher, with a bit of integration, you can find the exact energy required to escape earth's gravitational pull. i cant do it at the moment but i did it last year). As for swinging and picking projectory into the moon, that also can be done with again highschool physics.

As for technology, yes it was the most difficult part of the mission. But it was far from impossible. If you think about it, it was a rocket with a ship on top. What is so impossibly hard about that? Sure the rocket had to not explode and carry enough fuel to escape the gravity well of the earth, but then the rocket is ditched! The module then goes and lands, stays there and comes back to earth. I fail to see whats so technologically impossible about this, i mean it was 1965. Not the 1800s. By 1965, "modern" jets already exists. And the famous F14 tomcat (tom cruise top gun?) would have its first flight in 1970.

4Moon landing, 1969. Empty Re: Moon landing, 1969. Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:39 pm

TheRustySpoon

TheRustySpoon
Quake III Member
Quake III Member

Actually now i think about it maybe it was the G = gm1m2/r^2 one.... hmm i forget.

5Moon landing, 1969. Empty Re: Moon landing, 1969. Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:50 pm

T@D

T@D
*pWp*Founder*
*pWp*Founder*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7IoCYDaS-Q&feature=related

To me this is extreme proof hte Apollo 11 moon landing was a hoax. I do believe we may have made it there on a later mission, but the original landing was a hoax.