quevz wrote:
and this time he's right again. tad tried to defend reckoning, but his reply i just noticed some kind of hate to eRa or something against jorel, it didn't reflect something like a review defending him.
I love people that can't read.
First off I didn't defend anyone. If you actually took the time to read my post you would see that.
Secondly.. My 1st paragraph was off topic but not hate towards era....and no it did not reflect the demo.......and I made that quite obvious.
I reviewed the 1st demo and posted my opinions. I don't see how my post was defending him at all. My saying that there was times that I could not explain was defending him?
Maybe take the time to read before you post....
T@D wrote:
Ok.. on demo 1. IN MY OPINION.
30% of it... It seemed overly obvious that he had no clue where people were even using sound. He typically shot to the wrong side of pillars an almost every fight the pillar was between him and them. He would shot left when they went right, and vice versa.
40% of the time he had some obvious wall follows that easily could be contributed to the fact of the amount of time that hte map is played and knowing how people move and typical placements.
30% I could not explain and seemed like he had assistance. Either a chat server or a wall hack. I can't honestly say.... but from the demo there is no way I could explain how he knew some locations.
I will say his aim in the open seems less accurate then his aim around corners..... which does seem fishy in a lot of ways.
Reck and I have had a lot of personal issues in the past. I do however consider him a friend. I take full responsibility that my opinion may have a bias base all thought I am trying not to.... but I'm only human.
My opinion, I have seen people banned for less suspicion. Although I would prefer to believe that he is clean.... at this time I can not say I "know" for sure based on demo one.
oAng3Lo5 wrote: I have around 7 years playing all weapons in this community and some years playing for fun tdm and ctf rail, just played a scrim vs him and his hack is pretty obvious and if jorel accused him, i believe now more that he's hacking because jorel has caught alot of hackers before but it is really sad to see how his friends defend him even when he's hacking and the other side is that people who defend him don't have the enought experience to say who's hacking or not so i don't know why they lost their times posting their "reviews" without the enough experience
-1 reckoning
I have caught hackers as well and have ref'd or ref almost every mainstream server in 1.16. That does not mean that I am right every time I post. As merk said, Jorel has been wrong as well...... thats normal. No one is always right/wrong. Also... at least here, I don't see anyone "defending" him. So that comment is pointless on these forums.
And as far as "experience" reviewing demos...... I'm sure I have been asked to review more demos in a day then you have in the 7 years you have played. The problem is anytime someone disagrees the other people automatically believe they have no experience..... which is not true.
I didn't defend reck. I said people have been banned/caught with less suspicion. If that's defending, well then... I don't know what to tell you. One thing that to me is very obvious is that most suspicion happens towards "noob" clans that are not competitive.... that get someone skilled. When reaper joined pwp he was demo'd alot..... when in o2o and UE.... he wasn't suspicious anymore. Wolf, same thing. And who brought to my attention that they were being suspected and demo'd while they were in pwp?..... Jorel and another era member. Granted that was along time ago but like I was trying to say.... 90% of time I have seen Jorel post about a hacker/cheater is when they have beaten him or his clan. That's not hatred towards him or era.... that's a fact.
I stick to my post that I can not explain 30% of demo 1.